Filter by Categories
Clinical Practice Research
Ethical Legal and Regulatory Considerations
Planning, Managing, and Publishing Research
Research Design and Method

Planning, Managing, and Publishing Research | CREd Library

Creating and Documenting Clinical Impact

Committee on Clinical Research, Implementation Science, and Evidence-Based Practice (CRISP)
Table of Contents Introduction to Creating and Documenting Clinical Impact Please note: The following transcript has been edited for length and clarity. Transcript Slide 1:Hello, thanks for choosing to participate in this unit called Creating and Documenting Clinical Impact.My name is Trina Spencer and I’m the chair of the Committee ... Continue to Article >>

Introduction to NIDCD Early-Career Grant Mechanisms

Alberto Rivera-Rentas
doi:10.1044/cred-pvd-c16009
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. Thank you again for the invitation. I'm going to be talking about to you today about the NIH and the NIDCD, as I mentioned before. July is going to be my 10th-year the NIH. I started at NIGMS ... Continue to Article >>

Planning for Your First R01 Grant Application

Jessica Huber
doi:10.1044/cred-pvd-c16008
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. Introductory Slides Kris Tjaden So our first session this afternoon is sort of a forward-thinking one. At some point you will be thinking about and planning your first R01, and so these are some thoughts and a little ... Continue to Article >>

Using Twitter and Blogs to Advance Your Research

Susan Rvachew
doi:10.1044/cred-pd-r101-002
Twitter is a researcher's paradise. That's where researchers hang out. And it just feels like being at home. When you're on there, there's a lot of other researchers, and I'm also very interested in politics, too, that's another place where I can get my kicks there. When I wake up ... Continue to Article >>

Peer Review

doi:10.1044/cred-pd-r101-001
About Peer Review What is peer review? The peer review process...involves the assessment of an article by volunteer reviewers (blind to the author and working independently of one another) who engage in the problem-solving task of identifying flaws within the research itself or its reporting and determining the overall value ... Continue to Article >>

Collaboration Roles and Responsibilities

Leora Cherney
doi:10.1044/cred-pvd-path009
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. Your ultimate goal, in terms of research, is to be the principal investigator of a grant you're going to submit. But there are lots of other roles that one could take on a research grant. So I'm going ... Continue to Article >>

Developing a Successful Collaboration

Ann Geers
doi:10.1044/cred-pvd-path008
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. I'm going to make three pretty fast points. I've never done any rewarding work without collaborators. It's the most important thing I've developed in my career. I'm going to talk to you about finding a good match for ... Continue to Article >>

Common Strengths and Weaknesses in Grant Applications

Christopher Moore
doi:10.1044/cred-pvd-path019
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. The other side of the formula. You think grantwriting is really torture, and you're really having to create these new ideas and you're this incredible generator. It's actually much more formulaic than that at both sides. Reviewers are ... Continue to Article >>

Anatomy of the SF424: A Formula for NIH Research Grants

Christopher Moore
doi:10.1044/cred-pvd-path018
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. A concept I usually refer to at this point is the idea of the Anna Karenina principle. To paraphrase, the idea is that all happy grants look the same, but there are many, many ways for grants to ... Continue to Article >>