The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. We’re going to focus on Abstract and Specific Aims. The reason why we really focus on these, beyond the fact that this is the most widely read section
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. Significance In the Significance Section, I’ve highlighted the key words straight from the instructions on what you should include. What we’re recommending is that you take this exact
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. We’re now moving to the Approach and Preliminary Studies section. We’ve talked a great deal about this idea that projects have to be high in significance and high
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. We’re going to tell you a little bit about what happens once your grant is submitted to NIH — this is specifically about NIH reviews. There are two
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. Getting Started We’re going to start with an overview of grantsmanship tips. Preliminary Planning Elena Plante: Getting started: the idea here is that grant writing starts long before
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. Holly Storkel: We’re picking up basically where the review leaves off. So we’ve walked through all of the sections, how to write each one of them. You’ve seen
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. We’re back to the point where you have gotten that review back. And so we’re going to consider sort of two different scenarios. One is the good score
The following is a transcript of the presentation video, edited for clarity. Point/Counterpoint: There are multiple paths to success. Another fork in the road. There is not just one yellow brick road that takes you to social impact, R01s, tenure,
The following is a digested version of the presentation video transcript. Impact Score The impact score: The reviewers provide an overall impact score that reflects their whole assessment of the value of the grant. It reflects their assessment of the
ASHA publishes four peer-reviewed scholarly journals and one peer-reviewed scholarly review journal pertaining to the general field of communication sciences and disorders (CSD) and to the professions of audiology and speech-language pathology. These journals are the American Journal of Audiology; American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology; Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research; Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools; and Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. These journals have the collective mission of disseminating research findings, theoretical advances, and clinical knowledge in CSD.
General Questions: journals@asha.org
For Perspectives: perspectives@asha.org
