Yes. We recommend that the author(s) explain in the cover letter how the pre-analysis plan (and thus study) was modified in light of reviews from Stage 1.
To associate an existing ORCiD with your ASHA Editorial Manager account, login to Editorial Manager and click on “Update My Information” in the top menu. Then, in the “Personal Information” box on the following page, enter your ORCiD in the field provided. Or, you can click the “fetch/register” link next
In Stage 1, reviewers evaluate the importance of the research question and quality of the proposed design. At the conclusion of this stage, the editor may reject the submission, request revisions that may be sent back to reviewers, or accept the submission “in principle.” If a paper is accepted in
Stage 1 In Stage 1, reviewers are asked to review the registered report along five dimensions: Importance of the research question Soundness of proposed hypothesis Soundness and feasibility of proposed design (including statistical power) Whether proposed experiment offers an adequate and appropriate test of hypothesis Whether proposed methods are appropriate
A registered report only differs from a traditional research paper in that the proposed experiment has not yet been conducted. Otherwise, a registered report should look very much like a traditional research paper.
The suggested maximum page limit for registered reports is 40 manuscript pages. Authors are encouraged to use an online appendix as a way to provide details that reviewers need to evaluate proposed experimental designs and supplemental materials for , as applicable.
No. The proposed experiment(s) can only be conducted after the Stage 1 review process is complete and the proposed design reflects the reviewers’ comments.
Yes. Previous research (registered or not) can be incorporated in a registered report in the same way it would be in a traditional paper — as a preliminary study in the main text or pilot study in the appendix. It is important that authors make clear in the text which
Yes, but this should be made clear in the main text and an anonymized version of registered pre-analysis plan for the larger project should be provided in the online appendix, so that reviewers can consider the hypotheses to be tested in the registered report in the broader context of other
As detailed as possible. Please use an appendix as a way to provide full details of experimental conditions, measures, and the like. Report everything that you would in a traditional paper, including power analyses, experimental stimuli, question wording, details about measurement (e.g., recoding, factor analysis, etc.), rationales for excluding data,
View the editorial, production, and peer review policies of the ASHA journals.
Get information on ethical considerations for reviewers regarding conflicts of interest.
ASHA publishes four peer-reviewed scholarly journals and one peer-reviewed scholarly review journal pertaining to the general field of communication sciences and disorders (CSD) and to the professions of audiology and speech-language pathology. These journals are the American Journal of Audiology; American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology; Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research; Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools; and Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. These journals have the collective mission of disseminating research findings, theoretical advances, and clinical knowledge in CSD.
General Questions: journals@asha.org
For Perspectives: perspectives@asha.org
